Privatize the Afghan War? An incredibly Stupid Idea

August 8, 2017

After sixteen years of fighting what is by now the longest war in our history, American policymakers are out of ideas when it comes to Afghanistan. The Bush administration was all about nation-building: if only we built schools so that Afghan women could be educated and “liberated,” a grateful people would abandon terrorism and the war would be won. The Obama administration – which came to power on the strength of candidate Obama’s contention that the Iraq war was “the wrong war,” and that we had neglected the Afghan front – instituted a “surge” of some 40,000 more US troops, and then declared victory in 2014. Now the Trump administration is confronted with the reality of the Taliban in charge of nearly half the country, and the dysfunctional Afghan government barely able to hold Kabul, the capital.

What to do?

Steve Bannon, President Donald Trump’s top political advisor and the architect of his 2016 election victory, has been pushing for the “zero option” – the complete withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. Bannon and his fellow nationalists want out for political and ideological reasons: they want to concentrate on the President’s domestic agenda, and oppose on principle the whole nation-building scheme that has been in place since the Obama years. This is what the Trump base wants, as well, but it looks like the nationalists have lost that debate, with the President taking the “zero option” off the table.

The generals, led by National Security Advisor H. R. McMaster, want to launch yet another “surge,” with at least 3,000 more US troops to be sent into the Afghan quagmire, and more taxpayer dollars pumped into the corrupt and incompetent Afghan governmental apparatus. Trump has reportedly rejected this option as well, and ordered his advisors to come up with a new plan. Meanwhile the Taliban continues to make gains on the battlefield, we continue to suffer casualties, and there is no new policy in place.

Into this policy vacuum comes Erik Prince, notorious founder of Blackwater, the world’s leading mercenary outfit: a company with a dubious history, and a CEO with a reputation to match. Reportedly the Bannon group, frustrated in their desire to get Trump to withdraw, is pushing a plan to “privatize” the Afghan war, and Prince is out there trying to drum up support for the idea. Here is Prince in an interview with Breitbart outlining his proposal.

Listening to Prince make his pitch, it becomes immediately clear that his scheme is not an alternative to a “surge” but rather an adjunct to it: he wants to let the generals have their way for six months or so, and then his company would be brought it to consolidate and maintain the gains made.

At that point, a “Viceroy” would be brought in who would have complete control of US policy in Afghanistan, presumably one of Prince’s employees if not Prince himself. The rules of engagement would be dispensed with, and any level of brutality would be allowed. Since the Afghan government is broke, and is entirely dependent on US aid, one has to assume that the American taxpayers would be paying for Prince’s “services” – oh, but Prince has a handy-dandy solution for this problem, which is to allow him to exploit Afghanistan’s supposedly fabulous mineral resources. Having pocketed this loot, Prince & Co. would be properly compensated for subjugating the Afghan people

Prince explicitly raises the example of the British East India Company, a mercantilist construct that deployed private armies in order to conquer the Indian subcontinent, as an example of a success story. Yet the East India Company was not a success: established in 1600 with a grant of monopoly on all trade with Asia, by 1772 it was begging the British government for a bailout.

Asked what “victory” in Afghanistan would look like, Prince is vague: the Afghan government would be relatively “stable,” and the “export of terrorism” from Afghan territory would cease. How and why Prince’s privateers would be any more successful in bringing this about than the US military has been over the course of the last sixteen years is not clear. What is clear, however, is that a mercenary army would have little incentive to declare – or actually achieve – victory, since that would mean its services were no longer required. Indeed, it would have a strong financial incentive to prolong the conflict – and gin up new ones. This is what happened with the British East India Company, which had a powerful lobby in the Parliament. While the East India lobby was focused on maintaining its monopoly privileges, and lobbying for “free trade,” Prince’s Mercenary Lobby would be pushing for more wars – and for subsidies from the taxpayers.

This kind of “privatization” means private profits for the politically connected and socialized costs imposed on the rest of us. The Prince scheme is crony capitalism at its very worst, imported into the foreign policy realm. It is, in short, a rip-off, just the sort of Washington insider deal that Trump vowed to rid us of when he declared war on what he calls “the swamp.” It doesn’t get much swampier than Erik Prince.

There is no alternative to withdrawing from Afghanistan other than doing what we’ve been doing for the past decade and a half. The Trump team criticizes the Obama administration for announcing our withdrawal date in advance, but was such an announcement really necessary? Short of annexing the country and making Afghanistan a US possession, like Puerto Rico or some Pacific atoll, the Taliban didn’t need to be told that the Americans would eventually be leaving.

It’s only a matter of time. Better now than later: better we don’t lose a single additional soldier in that godforsaken wasteland. It’s long past time to withdraw.

Source:   Privatize the Afghan War? An incredibly stupid idea

** Editor’s notes:  If Montanto, which now owns Blackwater aka Xe, replaces the US Army, what will prevent them from operating on American soil if the powers that be decide America is a “terrorist state”?  It’s bad enough our tax money is going to fund the opium crop owned by the British East India Company and the protection of it disguised as the “war in Afghanistan”.

We at believe General McMaster is pushing for the “zero-option”.  Anyone under attack by the Main Stream Media must be doing something right.  Stay tuned!

See also:  Monsanto Now Owns Blackwater (Xe)

Read Dr. John Coleman’s “The Conspirator’s Hierarchy The Committee of 300″.

If knowledge is power, then John Coleman has empowered all those who seek it. Unfortunately, the words “conspirator” or “conspiracy” have taken on a false meaning by those who seek to hide the truth. All a conspiracy is, is two or more people who “conspire.” Two or more people plan a course of action together. John Coleman goes in to the ground and unearths a seed, the very seed in which the rich and powerful “Committee of the three hundred,” used to gain power. Power that provided the means to control and fund banks, insurance agencies, top level hierarchical bodies, and more. These entities only exist to exert control on a global level. The seed that John Colman uncovered directly in the bloodied hands of those who’s insatiable thirst is to exert and maintain power over the world, is commonly known as the poppy seed.

Americans have fallen prey to world domination by subterfuge, and if someone does not shine a light in the darkness, we will all continue to live and fight for our limitations.

Please read this book and tell someone you know to read it. Pass it on and talk about it, or we may all be sheep. God Bless America.

See also:  McMaster Cleans House due to “Garbage Analysis” created by Zionists in the State Department

Zionist Organization of America Launches ‘Comprehensive Review’ of H.R. McMaster Israel History

Monsanto Emails Raise Issue of Influencing Research on Roundup Weed Killer


Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.