Judge to look at files in 1987 deaths of 2 boys found on central Arkansas railroad tracks

At left, Linda Ives in shown in this 2007 file photo. At right, the initial 1987 coverage in the Arkansas Democrat on the deaths of Ives’ 17-year-old son, Kevin, and 16-year-old Don Henry.

November 27, 2017

by Linda Satter

A mother’s 30-year quest to uncover secrets she hopes will shed light on her son’s mysterious death in 1987 has led a federal judge to order a private review of several tightly guarded government documents.

The documents may or may not reveal anything new about the death of Linda Ives’ 17-year-old son, Kevin, whose body was discovered before dawn on Aug. 23, 1987, alongside that of his friend, Don Henry, 16, on a dark stretch of Saline County railroad tracks. But the Benton woman says it’s time to find out.

Though the state medical examiner initially determined that the boys were struck by a train as they lay in a marijuana-induced deep sleep, another pathologist said he believed they were killed before their bodies were placed on the tracks — though no one has ever conclusively said how.

A number of wide-ranging theories, many revolving around reports of drug smuggling in the 1980s out of the Mena airport in Polk County, and some suggesting a government cover-up, have since taken root and developed lives of their own. They have been the subject of documentaries, movies and books.

The enduring mystery surrounding the boys’ deaths led the Benton woman to file a lawsuit last year seeking to force eight federal agencies and three Arkansas-based law enforcement agencies to produce any and all documents amassed over the past 30 years that may provide some answers. The lawsuit accuses the agencies of violating the federal Freedom of Information Act by failing to turn over complete documents in response to requests Ives and her Little Rock attorney, R. David Lewis, filed in 2012.

The requests sought all information the agencies may have in their archives pertaining to Kevin Ives or Barry Seal, a pilot who in 1985 testified that he smuggled tons of cocaine from Colombia to drop zones in the Louisiana swamps, and was assassinated in 1986 in his hometown of Baton Rouge.

Rumor has it that Seal, who flew regularly in and out of the Mena airport, was initially hired by the CIA to fly low over Central American countries taking photographs of rebels, and then began smuggling drugs back into the United States for extra cash.

Talk of low-flying planes in the area where the boys were run over by the train led to suspicions that their deaths might have had something to do with drug drops — and that perhaps they were killed, and then laid out on the tracks to cover up any evidence of murder, because they witnessed or tried to intercept a drop.

Ironically, the in-camera review, which is conducted by a judge in private, coincides with the recent release of a movie, American Made, that is based on the saga surrounding Seal.

Miller dismissed most of the agencies from the lawsuit in a July 25 summary judgment order. But on Nov. 15, he ordered the three remaining defendants — the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Department of Homeland Security — to turn over to him, by Dec. 1, all the unredacted documents they say are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

According to the government’s written objections to the records requests, the documents may include the minutes or transcripts of grand jury proceedings dating back to the early 1990s; investigators’ private notes to one another; the names of confidential witnesses; secret investigative techniques and theories; and possibly more recent information that has surfaced in an ongoing investigation.

Lewis said he doesn’t trust the government to supply all the information that Miller wants to review privately.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick Harris, whose office in the Eastern District of Arkansas is representing the federal defendants, said Wednesday that attorneys in his office are gathering all the documents in an attempt to comply with the order by the deadline, and that there is no plan to contest it.

The agencies Miller dismissed from the suit were the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division, the State Department, the FBI, the Arkansas State Police, the Saline County sheriff’s office and the Bryant Police Department.

Ives and Lewis said any documents they have obtained over the years from the various agencies in response to the Freedom of Information requests have been so heavily redacted as to be indecipherable and basically useless. They contend that after 30 years, the release of the information isn’t likely to put anyone in danger or upset any current investigations.

“I’m not after any grand jury minutes,” Lewis said last week.

He said he and Ives just want information that may explain how and why Kevin Ives died.

“Plaintiff is trying by this action to learn how her son was killed, by whom, and how and why, how and by whom his cause of death was covered up,” the lawsuit states, complaining that the named agencies have provided “inadequate responses by virtue of no response or highly redacted responses.”

The suit states that Ives “believes the only reason she has not received adequate responses is that an adequate response would show crimes by government officials and would expose them and government agencies to suits for damages.”

Ives could not be reached for comment.

According to news articles shortly after the boys’ deaths, the engineer of the train that couldn’t stop in time to avoid running over the boys at 4:25 a.m. Aug. 3, 1987, later said the train’s spotlight had illuminated them shortly before they were struck. He said they were lying on their backs, motionless and in a somewhat unnatural position, and covered by a tarp from the waist down. A rifle and a flashlight lay beside them.

The boys’ friends and acquaintances from Bryant High School later told authorities they had seen the two friends together earlier that night, Kevin Ives with a bottle of whiskey, and that Ives and Henry said they planned to go “headlighting” for deer later.

Crew members of an earlier train that had passed over the same stretch of tracks at 1:30 a.m. reported seeing no one on or near the tracks.

“There are lots of accounts of the cause of death of Kevin Ives from lots of books and other sources,” Lewis wrote in the lawsuit, “but the accounts support several inconsistent theories of who did what, which will be difficult to reconcile without the investigative reports from the defendants.”

According to an Oct. 4 memorandum written by Assistant U.S. Attorney Stacey McCord in Little Rock, both the Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys and the DEA have provided a “Vaughn index” to the court to explain their reasons for exempting some documents matching the request. The memo says an index “must adequately describe each withheld document or deletion from a released document, must state the exemption claimed for each, and explain why the exemption is relevant.”

McCord said a Freedom of Information request received by the Executive Office in 2013 had been referred from the FBI, which had received the request from Lewis in 2012. The request sought all records, recordings, documents and emails, unredacted, relevant to the death of Kevin Ives and regarding Mena Airport drug trafficking as related to Seal.

In response, the FBI referred 13 pages to the Executive Office, which on Sept. 20, 2013, sent Lewis a letter saying it was withholding the 13 pages “in full,” pursuant to laws prohibiting the disclosure of grand-jury material. It said Lewis appealed to the Office of Information Policy, which on Feb. 25, 2014, affirmed the exemption.

The memo says the 13 pages include an 11-page letter from the U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana to an FBI agent that “discussed the investigative techniques used by law enforcement during a Grand Jury investigation of a criminal case. … The document contains information that would reveal the identity of sources of information, the scope of the investigation and where the government is seeking its evidence. It contains names of the targets of the investigation and members of the law enforcement who were involved in the investigation.”

The second document is a letter from the U.S. attorney in Louisiana to the Administrative Office of the Courts and an attachment, which McCord said discusses the scope and direction of a grand jury investigation, and constitutes attorney work product, making it exempt.

She said the two documents comprising the 13 pages also were withheld “to protect the identities of third-party individuals named in the documents, such as potential witnesses and law enforcement personnel,” and because the release of the information “could subject the persons to unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy and subject them to harassment, harm, or exposure to unwarranted or derogatory publicity and inferences.”

She said the Executive Office “determined that there was no countervailing public interest” that would outweigh the privacy rights.

McCord said other documents withheld include DEA reports of investigation, which memorialize investigative and intelligence activities related to a law enforcement activity and are protected by the Privacy Act, and interoffice memos, which, by revealing the identity of a confidential source, “could reasonably be expected to endanger the health and safety of individuals whose names appear in the materials or those connected with them.”

The memo says the requests to Homeland Security couldn’t be answered because the agency was created Jan. 24, 2003, after Ives’ death, and no records responsive to the request could be found.

Source:  Judge to look at files in 1987 deaths of 2 boys found on central Arkansas railroad tracks

Judge to Review Clinton Murder Documents, Seth Rich Helps Reignite Kevin Ives Investigation

A federal judge has ordered a private review of tightly guarded documents related to an unsolved murder of two boys covered up by local authorities 30 years ago, then governor Bill Clinton was accused of being involved with the death after he reportedly made a deal with the medical examiner accused of destroying key evidence related to the case. It is believed that teenagers Kevin Ives and Don Henry witnessed a drug operation allegedly tied to Clinton and the CIA. The mother of one of the victims recently asked the public for help in reigniting the investigation into this murder.

Original Articles: http://m.arkansasonline.com/news/2017/nov/26/judge-to-look-at-files-in-2-boys-1987-d/

http://rightwavemedia.com/2017/06/07/kevin-ives-linda-ives-internet-help/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=9&v=FOpJqGiKL_8

Video published on November 27, 2017 courtesy of Chris Simpson Channel

Murder On The Tracks – The Story of Kevin Ives and Don Henry

On August 23, 1987 teenagers Kevin Ives and Don Henry were brutally murdered and their bodies placed on railroad tracks in an effort to conceal their murders. This is the story of what happened that night, the immediate cover-up which reached the highest levels of government, and the admirable, and still on-going, crusade waged by Kevin’s mother, Linda Ives, to get Justice for the murders of Kevin and Don.

Part 1 of the “All For Justice… And Justice For All” series. As Linda is now retired, it is difficult and costly to keep up her fight. Please feel free to make a contribution towards helping bring this treacherous case to a close, with some Justice finally being served!

THE KEVIN IVES/DON HENRY GoFundMe PAGE… https://www.gofundme.com/donhenry-kev…

Linda Ives appeared on a Reddit AMA on Wed June 7, 2017. Here some of the Q and A with her…

Q – “Thanks for doing the AMA! My question is, who are the individuals you feel are the most responsible for the murder and cover up of the boys?” Linda – “Number one on the list as far as killers would be special prosecutor Dan Harmon who orchestrated the murders and cover up.

The others I believe were there are Keith Mckaskle, Larry Roushall, Sharline Wilson, narcotics detective kirk Lane, narcotics detective Jay Campbell, and deputy Danny Allen. The list of those directly involved in the coverup not listed already includes deputy prosecutor Richard Garrett, then sheriff Jim Steed, detective Chuck Tallent, detective Rick Elmendorf, Judge John Cole and many, many others who have been willing to look the other way over the years.”

Q – “Do you think the Clinton’s and the CIA drug trade were involved in your son’s death?” Linda – “We knew early on that there were drugs drops involved but assumed it was a small local operation. Our focus for many years was on who was there and not where the drugs came from. It wasn’t until 1990 that we learned the drugs were being dropped by plane. We were able to locate a pilot, who was interviewed by Jean Duffey (a former deputy prosecutor and drug task force director). He stated he had flown that “route” a number of times and we were able to corroborate geographical information he provided.”

Q – “Do you think any other state officials or officials in the federal government know the truth about your son’s death and are staying silent about it for some reason? If so, who and for what reasons?” Linda – “Both Republicans and Democrats have exposure in the Mena /Iran /contra operation which is why they have been highly successful in the coverup. There are many people that know, in my opinion, especially within the FBI.”

Q – “Can you share your favorite memory you have of Kevin?” Linda – “Kevin was so in love with his car which was a 1983 blue camaro with T tops. Nearly every day after school he would be in the front yard washing it. So many times I would drive up to see him out there almost stroking it for lack of a better word:)) I also loved to see him put the tops back on after arriving home and he would lean over and look into the side mirror and comb his hair which had been blown from the T tops being down.”

Link to the full Q and A – https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/c…

***UPDATE/CORRECTION*** on the information in the movie, about Linda Ives not knowing about the existence of Sharline Wilson’s confession letter until 2015. She did know about it, but thought it was discredited, until her Police friend dug it up and found a lot of corroborating evidence in it in 2015. They then went to Casady, who referred them to Wright, and so on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ow0yPO8g9YA

Video published on November 27, 2017 courtesy of Carnage On ice

See also:  When Roger Reaves Met Barry Seal

 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


Protected with IP Blacklist CloudIP Blacklist Cloud